Introduction
In 2008, race car driver Danica Patrick made history as the first woman to win an IndyCar Series race, yet much of the media coverage that followed focused more on her appearance than her accomplishment. This type of objectification reflects a broader issue in sports media, where female athletes are often portrayed in ways that emphasize their looks over their skills. This case study will examine how women are visually represented in sports media, how audiences react to and reinforce those portrayals, and how this reflects ongoing gender disparities documented in academic research on sports coverage. The objectification of women in sports media remains a significant barrier to achieving gender equality in athletics.
Sports media coverage often prioritizes female athletes’ appearance over their athleticism.
For over a decade, Sports Illustrated has released its annual “Body Issue,” which features male and female athletes in stylized nude portraits meant to celebrate the human form. However, this portrayal has consistently demonstrated a double standard in how male and female athletes are presented. A five-year content analysis found that images of female athletes were far more likely to depict them in passive, posed ways that failed to highlight their athletic abilities, while men were portrayed in action-oriented or sport-specific poses (Martin et al., 2018). Ranieri (2019) further critiques the Body Issue, writing that “whether intentionally or not, the Body Issue adds to the normalizing of sexual objectification of women in our society.” This reflects a broader trend in media coverage, where the focus often shifts from women’s talent to their appearance, diminishing the recognition of their skill and effort.
Ancheta et al. (2020) noted that even when media outlets attempt to promote gender balance, men are still portrayed as dominant figures in their sports, while women’s appearances and personal lives are more frequently discussed. As seen in the Body Issue, male athletes are easily identified by their sport due to their poses and props, whereas many female athletes are posed ambiguously, making it difficult to associate them with any particular sport unless the viewer already knows who they are. This aesthetic framing reinforces the idea that a woman’s visual appeal takes precedence over her professional accomplishments.
This media practice not only distorts public perception but also influences which athletes receive endorsements, visibility, and legacy-building opportunities. When female athletes are continually represented through a lens of beauty or sexuality, it sends a message to both fans and aspiring athletes that looks matter more than performance. This undermines the mission of sports as a meritocracy and deepens gender inequality within both the media and the broader sports industry.
Public reactions to female athletes in the media reflect and reinforce these objectifying portrayals
Audience responses to female athletes often echo the same objectification found in media portrayals. For instance, when tennis star Serena Williams was featured in various magazine covers and advertisements, public commentary often focused more on her body than her achievements, sparking racialized and gendered discourse online (Douglas, 2012). Similarly, public reaction to Alex Morgan’s SI Swimsuit photoshoot highlighted her attractiveness while sidelining her World Cup-winning soccer legacy (Kane et al., 2018). This tendency to reduce female athletes to visual spectacle not only overshadows their professional success but also shapes how younger audiences view women in sport.
A 2020 analysis of social media commentary showed that female athletes received more comments about their appearance than their performance, especially on platforms like Instagram, where engagement is often tied to visual content (Lebel & Danylchuk, 2020). This trend suggests that audiences are primed to value physical attractiveness over athletic ability, partly because media narratives and imagery shape their expectations. Moreover, athletes who don’t fit Western beauty ideals are more likely to face criticism or receive less engagement altogether (Fink, 2015).
These reactions create a feedback loop: media objectifies, audiences consume and reinforce that objectification, and athletes are pressured to conform to gain visibility or sponsorships. This leads to a culture where young girls may feel that appearance, not skill, is the ticket to success in sports, diminishing sport’s potential to empower and inspire across all identities.
These portrayals and reactions mirror broader academic findings on gender disparity in sports media.
The disproportionate objectification of female athletes in the media aligns closely with decades of research showing systemic gender inequity in sports coverage. Messner, Duncan, and Wachs (2000) found that women’s sports receive significantly less airtime, and when covered, the commentary often lacks the depth or excitement given to men’s sports. When coverage does exist, it frequently leans into personal stories, relationships, or looks, trivializing women’s athletic efforts.
A more recent study by Cooky, Messner, and Musto (2015) revealed that even as women’s sports gained popularity, the tone of coverage remained “gendered and marginalizing.” Despite historic achievements, female athletes were still framed as novelties or outliers rather than professionals on par with men. This framing helps explain why audience reactions often align with media depictions because both are rooted in outdated, patriarchal views of femininity and athleticism.
Taken together, media depictions, public reactions, and scholarly research form a cohesive picture: female athletes face a layered system of inequality that diminishes their contributions and reinforces gender norms. Until media outlets commit to more equitable, performance-centered coverage, and audiences demand better, these disparities will continue to harm the visibility, perception, and success of women in sports.
Conclusion
The objectification of women in sports is not just a media issue, it reflects and reinforces broader societal beliefs about gender, power, and worth. From magazines to Instagram to fan forums, female athletes are too often celebrated for how they look, not what they do. This case study underscores how media coverage, public perception, and systemic research all point to a need for urgent change. If we want sports to truly be empowering, we must shift the focus from appearance to performance, and recognize all athletes for their achievements, not their aesthetics.
Sources
Ancheta, A. S., Peet, J., Abuyen, A., & Shifflett, B. (2020). Gender balance in ESPN and espnW content. Journal of Kinesiology & Wellness, 9, 1-12.
Cooky, C., Messner, M. A., & Musto, M. (2015). “It’s dude time!”: A quarter century of excluding women’s sports in televised news and highlight shows. Communication & Sport, 3(3), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479515588761
Douglas, D. D. (2012). Venus, Serena, and the inconspicuous consumption of blackness: A commentary on surveillance, commodification, and sisterhood. Journal of Black Studies, 43(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934711410880
Fink, J. S. (2015). Female athletes, women’s sport, and the sport media commercial complex: Have we really “come a long way, baby”? Sport Management Review, 18(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2014.05.001
Kane, M. J., LaVoi, N. M., & Fink, J. S. (2018). Exploring elite female athletes’ interpretations of sport media images: A window into the construction of social identity and “selling sex” in women’s sports. Communication & Sport, 6(3), 282–306.
Lebel, K., & Danylchuk, K. (2020). Instagram and female athlete branding: Navigating authenticity and objectification. International Journal of Sport Communication, 13(3), 325–352.
Martin, T. G., McNary, E. L., Suh, Y. I., & Gregg, E. A. (2018). A content analysis of pictorial content in entertainment and sports programming networks (ESPN): The magazine’s body issue. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 9, 1–9.
CU SPORTS MEDIA PROJECT 